Category Archives: General

Gun Shy

It won’t surprise you to hear that one is less than inclined to revisit whitewater rafting on the heels of a particularly bouncy spill. Likewise one is excusably hesitant to retry a backflip if the consequences of the previous effort were rather awkward. In short we are comprehensibly reluctant to repeat an act after being burned. When however we adopt a general wariness of living, the inclination is less about caution and more about fear and we risk becoming as useless as a gun shy bird dog. Being wary of taking risks is one thing but it is quite another to be afraid of the consequences of error. Becoming panic-stricken and petrified of living goes far beyond timidity.

One has to wonder how we imperceptibly graduate from being a robust individual with an affirmative attitude to living to a retiring dullard nervous about doing anything. Perhaps youth was more about guts than gusto; perhaps we were then better equipped to deal with the complications of life. Maybe we even had the wherewithal or bloody-mindedness to rebound from the frontiers we confronted. Eventually however we begin to rationalize our amortization. We may even be prompted to carry with us an arsenal of defences, like a gun shy woman who carries pepper spray whenever she walks alone. But the truth will out as we face the penetrating question within us: Can I do this?

Likely you’ve heard the quip attributed to one of those brainy chaps like Einstein or Socrates who said that the more he learned, the more he realized how much he didn’t know. I don’t know about you but I take the point. There is additionally some comfort in that philosophy; it at least makes one feel less a Philistine. It also affords consolation for the increasing weight of life’s inexplicable nuances and loggerhead debates. Rather than perceiving a task as merely insurmountable there is authority for attributing to it a level of inscrutability which indeed merits some circumspection and distance.

Making excuses for what amounts to little more than pusillanimity is not however very persuasive in the end. Even if one were to forgive a lack of stamina on the theory that one is by virtue of maturity or experience able to bear the deprivation of mental acuity, the flavour of defeat nonetheless lingers. The simple fact is that we’ve become gun shy. Regrettably it is all too easy to lapse into the doldrums and sluggishly accept the resulting inactivity. Why after all push the envelope so to speak? Surely there has to come a point in life when there is no longer the need to fulfill what is mere obligation? When at last is it both opportune and appropriate to put down the trowel?

This rhetoric is unhappily no more convincing than any other pretext for inadequacy. As long as one is feeling squashed by what we face, there is nothing glamorous about it at all. Redundant doesn’t begin to capture the sentiment!

The solution of course is an illustration of the principle that there is nothing to fear but fear itself. This always struck me as a moderately trite observation until I sorted out that, apart from fear, it was often impossible to isolate a particular source of the threat one felt. Upon examination I have discovered that the discomposing element of a venture is frequently not entirely without foundation; more specifically the culprit is not one’s inability to deal with the issue but rather the discernment which we unintentionally bring to bear upon it. More of that Socratic stuff if you will, the piling on of knowledge to the point of temporarily immobilizing ourselves and detracting from our fathoming the problem. Nonetheless this shouldn’t deter us from pursuing a dissection of the mental offensive we now meet face to face with hostile intent. It is by contrast a small compliment to the blackguard who is too thick to appreciate any refinement of the issue that he is not rendered inoperative by it. We on the other hand, though suffering the current indignity of being gun shy, will with almost plodding patience and analysis see ourselves clear of the conundrum. We may at last dismiss the riddle as a mere brainteaser but it certainly won’t paralyze us with the inertia of indecision. The trophy for such exceptional behaviour is pure inner satisfaction plus the knowledge that we did it!

Funny how things happen!

“If I am inclined to suppose that a mouse has come into being by spontaneous generation out of grey rags and dust, I shall do well to examine those rags very clearly to see how a mouse may have hidden in them, how it may have got there and so on. But if I am convinced that a mouse cannot come into being from these things, then this investigation will perhaps be superfluous.” Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosphical Investigations We’re all busy. We haven’t time for tiresome inquisitions. It doesn’t however overwork the mental cylinders to acknowledge that our current station in life is pretty much the product of our application to date. Given our deportment we shouldn’t be surprised by our condition in life. It is after all tautological. Indeed we dare not think otherwise. Yet it is almost with stunned recognition that we admit to the very predictable state of our affairs. The concession of this glaring inevitability hardly qualifies as insightful. Did we imagine that our actions had no consequences? Did we suppose that the first principles of logic were somehow lost on our daily lives? Did we presume living unfolded beyond the realm of thought? If one finds the detached precision of deductive reasoning shamefully inappropriate to the poetry of living, I am reminded of the 15th century proverb, “What’s bred in the bone will out in the flesh.” The upshot of our lives is neither a ballad nor a crap shoot. I don’t mean to diminish the wonder of living or to suggest that we are stereotypical, but we might at least acknowledge that the results of our actions and “what’s bred in the bone”, while perhaps not expected, might have been foreseen or even anticipated. Distracted as we are by living in the moment, we react spasmodically to urges and sensibilities without a great deal of farsightedness. It would be a stretch to suggest that during our once carefree youth we had any concern about how things would turn out. The unsettling corollary however is that almost without exception the spreading of our history brutally lays bear an identifiable nexus between what we did and what we have become. If I am correct that there is an element of inevitability about life presumably one needn’t become too intent upon changing its course. Nonetheless I hold it to be equally true that there are crossroads in life and that the path we pursue will ultimately lead to different though plainly unsurprising conclusions. Whether it is calculated reasoning or whimsical passion which drives us one way or another is quite irrelevant; I merely emphasize the connection between the choice and the result. As a life-altering assertion this line of observation has about as much weight as any other “adult” admonition. Competing with the possible legitimacy of such objective evaluation is the swell of emotion which so often accompanies the vitality of youth. Yet whatever stage of life we’re at the powwow is always whether to listen to our instincts or to our head. And frankly I would be hard pressed to promote one over the other. Again the thesis is not how we should live, rather that what we live depends on the selections we make. While this discussion borders on the trite, it is nonetheless remarkable that we so frequently find ourselves alarmed by its constancy. We suddenly awaken to the life-long extrapolations of our actions and blankly gape, “Funny how things happen!” Of course there’s nothing funny about it at all. This is the real unavoidable nature of life; namely, we’ll get what we deserve. Granted, hard medicine for some. Even if one is inclined to accept the course of one’s life with composure it is disquieting to acknowledge the fateful role we’ve played in getting there. If one isn’t happy about things it doesn’t help to sully either the decisions we’ve made or the results they’ve precipitated by condemning ourselves. I can’t believe that there is anyone who is entirely satisfied with their lot in life but even if there were, it peculiarly remains a matter of mystery how the complicated and meticulous affairs of life transpire in spite of their transparent evolution. The details of our live are never an accident though it is alarmingly news to most of us! Apart from the fact that examination discloses one’s convictions, there are several threads which derive from this analysis. Foremost is the rhetorical question whether, given the opportunity, we would alter anything we have previously done. I think not. Let’s be honest, the appetites which once drove us were far too convincing to be trumped by armchair philosophy. Even if the question were directed more to avenues than appetites, it is a distinction without a difference. Another branch of consideration is whether we would have been happier had we made other choices. This is equally theoretical but again I defer to the paramountcy of nature, by which I mean the acceptance of what is. It is a deceit and a fraud upon life to imagine being someone you are not. One’s existence is your own doing and by that virtue not contrived, a sufficient reward I would think. Finally there is the matter of substance; viz., have we accomplished anything worth mentioning? It is ineluctable that upon an examination of where we are, the issue of its merit attends. This however is a misleading enquiry if for no other reason than that it is redundant; it is a subterfuge to the assessment of one’s life. When at last we hit the wall and confront the blunt achievement of our being, whether the light-bulb moment percolates in the middle of the night or while sipping one’s evening restorative, there is naturally nothing to be done about it, like it or not. Reversal for example is entirley out of the question. Regret is a waste of time. Adoption of heroic measures is likewise uncalled for. This isn’t about a display of feigned or exaggerated suffering to obtain sympathy or admiration. One can only resign to the moment and pronounce unflappably, “Funny how things happen!”

I’ll never be a billionaire

I recently heard it reported by an authoritative US news network that the American Dream no longer holds the stock it once did. Apparently popular acceptance of the myth is on the decline. Not surprising I suppose, considering the combined phenomena of bank collapses, investment market shrinkage, unemployment and the looming Chinese dominance. Even with the contemporary successes of Microsoft, Facebook and Google, the perceived chance of an immigrant graduating from the kitchen of the Waldorf Astoria to become its owner is now considered more fanciful than real. The general theory seems to be that it won’t be the little guy who makes a difference; rather that the rich will simply get richer. “them’s that’s got, gets”.

While there may indeed be some among us who harbour the ornate hope or expectation of becoming a zillionaire, I suspect the majority of us are content to have an interesting career and perhaps one that pays somewhat better than bus drivers (who frankly appear to be doing quite well). This capitulation to mediocrity may in the opinion of some be an acknowledgement of defeat. I prefer to balance the view by reminding myself that most of us in North America already have so much more than the rest of the world that I have trouble convincing myself that another billion will improve my life measurably; it’s one of those diminishing returns things. I mean to say, there’s only so much food one can eat and so many cars one can drive. And even in a 2,500 square foot house I only occupy the kitchen and the study with any regularity. The bigger challenge is to improve on the view from within rather than the view from without.

I will of course acknowledge that I am still impressed by a Rolls Royce. One slipped by quietly the other day, a plain charcoal colour with darkened windows and an obvious presence. I sat up and took notice, no question! But really, unless you have the right place to park it and unless you intend to drive it only where there is the remotest likelihood of having it repaired if need be, you’re pretty much imprisoned by it, not to mention the cost of maintaining and insuring it and sustaining everything else that goes along with it. And I can’t imagine that even if I hadn’t to worry myself about those trifles I would be any different from the person I am now. It is just another reminder that “there ain’t no ship to take you away from yourself”.

In that respect the American Dream is best kept as a dream, affording us the privilege of cherished ambition without having to admit to self-deluding fantasy. The hope of becoming a billionaire is about as transparent and probable as winning the lottery though it doesn’t diminish inspired optimism. What is more foreseeable is that few of us are prepared to do what it takes to become an exceptional success. Let’s not forget the unglamorous truth of success. As Phyllis Diller said, “The harder I work, the luckier I get”. And it isn’t just the hard work, it’s the sacrifices along the way. We all have heard of the wear and tear of hard work upon personal relationships. Then there are the stories of endless denial and skimping to get where one is going. In the end you’re left holding all the marbles but quite alone and burned out.

Such dark stories may be nothing more than sour grapes. Who will ever know the state of mind of the average billionaire? I remain however persuaded that the only contest worth the effort is to do the best you can with what you have, no matter the outcome. The little I know about billionaires is that frequently they were motivated by what they were doing, not by how much money it was going to make them. In the result, the instruction is the same for us all.

One mustn’t become despondent about having failed to reach the pinnacle of commercial success. In elementary terms, comparison on any level is fraught with hazard. Remember, if you’re reading this, you’re still here and Steve Jobs is dead. That is a blunt observation and maybe unnecessarily extreme but the illustration of any point is always made easier by acute examples. And if it comes down to a question of fairness, that enquiry is about as useful as trying to fathom how a roulette wheel really works. I am prepared to abandon the aspiration to become a billionaire and to settle for the uncharted depths of my personal experience. If the price of things matters I suppose it is arguable that no amount of money will ever purchase what is mine and mine alone as small a compliment as that may be in the minds of others. Besides, even if someone were to ask how much I wanted for it, I’m not sure a billion would suffice!

 

Cursum Perficio (“I finish the course”)

Perfection, as illusory as the topic may resound, is nonetheless the goal of untold characters. It isn’t for example the isolated stronghold of the fastidious obsessive who unabashedly arranges the things on his desk at the end of the day with the calibration of an engineer. Nor is it exclusively the domain of (apparently) less contrived male and female models with unblemished skin and satiny hair. By contrast the pursuit of perfection is alive among such conventional candidates as automobile enthusiasts who spend hours detailing their vehicles in preparation for an ephemeral but rewarding Saturday afternoon drive on dry pavement.

Given the certain philosophical debate whether a circle is more perfect than a square and that the answer is in any event virtually irrelevant it must be allowed that the pursuit of perfection is as much about the process as the plan; getting there is half the fun. There is so much latitude about what constitutes perfection that to adopt one model over another is not only impossible but also conceivably pointless. Nonetheless such approximations seldom diminish the search for what might be unobtainable though not otherwise unreasonable. Who after all can fault another for aiming for the highest standards? And what dissatisfaction is there in having tried to get there?

The only risk I can see in commitment to a supreme measure of quality is that its occupation may become insatiable. Where the parameters of perfection are so obviously lacking in definition, one has to wonder where it all ends? Herein lies the one very practical element of perfection; namely not only that its pursuit may prove to be unattainable but also that its utility is indefinable. There is the danger of becoming caught in a relentless running wheel with about as much hope of reaching the end.

People yet cling to the hope of impressing their notion of perfection on what they do or upon the things they own. Even though it is unimaginable that there will ever be anything approaching the sublime concept of perfection, the pursuit of unparalleled excellence is the motivation of many. And while the result may not be exactly awe-inspiring this isn’t to say that it is ridiculous. Just as we have developed such words as “patina” and “character” to accommodate the patent yet tolerable flaws of things and people, the products of age and experience, so too we can adopt a level of absolution for the short-comings of our subjective perfection without having to capitulate entirely to lower standards. It may simplify the argument for or against the pursuit of perfection to consider the matter in the context of alternatives; viz., the choice of the lesser of two evils, perfection or mediocrity. And I suppose that if taken to the extreme we confront the final question in life: Does anything really matter? But it flies in the face of nature to eliminate our sensibilities entirely. Like it or not, most of us have our standards and for some that standard is perfection.

It may help resolve the conundrum to examine the etymology of the term perfection. Its historical development gives us a significant clue to not only its meaning but also its vagary. Facere (to make or do) and Per (through) gives us “perficio” which is to say “to make it through to the end” or “to finish” whence the modern concept of completeness arises and thus its association with superlatives. Eventually the word was meant to imply sufficiency in the sense of attainment of purpose, itself a hint at the early philosophical concept of harmony and the later Christian doctrine of flawlessness. Whatever interpretation is preferred it remains that it is the striving for perfection that captures its root, including the constancy of such striving (“He who stops, regresses” – Augustine). Even apart from the religious spin, the aesthetic quality of perfection which characterized the Pythagoreans contained an underlying dogma of beauty which was not only apt (suitable) but without deviation. In the result we haven’t the need to contaminate our efforts by possible failure if we only seek to complete the course. It is but an inductive leap from this initial proposition to the further paradox that the greatest perfection is imperfection. This latter theory encompasses the element that incompleteness is by its nature stimulus for unending improvement as true perfection depends upon progress. How relieving! Each of us may in the result be far closer to perfection than we might previously have imagined!

Summer Holiday

We have just returned from a summer vacation in Florida.  This is the first time since I was seventeen years old that I have taken a summer holiday. Granted there may have been holidays when I returned home from university but those so-called vacations were really nothing more than blank time between summer jobs and returning to school.  As I said, the last time I recall a true summer holiday was the summer I spent on the Costa Brava in Spain, then Paris, France and Stockholm, Sweden when I was seventeen years old.

In this instance our original plan had been to go to Shediac, New Brunswick during the same two-week period at the beginning of July.  This direction was primarily because my late father was from New Brunswick and I have for years harboured some regret at not having acquainted myself with his roots. However our penchant for Fort Lauderdale (which we have visited several times before) won the day when we reasoned the likelihood of encountering masses of families with children on the northern Atlantic seaboard.  It turns out we were wrong about the distinction as the resort in Florida was surprisingly popular with families (and their horrid children).

In any event the southern detour was not without its compensating moments. I refer specifically to the epiphany I experienced upon the day of our departure from Fort Lauderdale. In our customary anxiety to get on with things we found ourselves putting suitcases into the trunk of the car at the front door of the resort at 1:30 a.m. on Friday, July 18th.  This early hour activity is amusingly not unusual for us when once we have set our collective mind to a task.  As we quietly made our way out of Fort Lauderdale and onto the Interstate 95 North my mind for some reason turned to a contemplation of my candidacy in the upcoming municipal election.  This was a concern which had preoccupied me since I filed my nomination papers with the Clerk of the Town on April 30th last.  Perhaps the recent weeks spent swimming in the warm Atlantic waters, the leisurely evening meals and the days spent at the spa and in the sun all combined to remind me of the pleasures of the southerly climate generally.  And more especially to remind me of my dread of Canadian winters.  In addition I had lately been warned by the Town Clerk and those familiar with municipal matters generally that the agenda for new Councillors is particularly onerous during the first few months after the election (which is to be held on October 27th next).  Along the way I had made some casual investigations about the cost of flying back from the south to attend Council meetings; the initial enquiries were not encouraging.

I should add that this past January we had booked two months on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.  These arrangements were subsequently abruptly reversed after I announced my candidacy for election and indeed upon our request our full account payment was returned to us.  As we drove north from Florida I was overcome with the silliness of what I had precipitated.  It may also have helped sober me on the point that only days before I had resigned my tenure as a columnist with the Millstone News (our local electronic newspaper) upon discovery that either no one or very few were reading what I had worked so hard to write.  The effect of that revelation was a combination of disappointment and recognition that I had successfully deceived myself into thinking I had any special literary talent to offer.  The effect of it was to estrange me from anything which depended upon public approbation.  The resulting seclusion caused me to rethink other important matters in my life and to reassess what was important to me and to me alone.  I realized that being on Hilton Head Island in the winter was something I had long anticipated and I decided in a flash that I wasn’t about to let it slip through my fingers a second time.  While driving out of Florida on that dark early morning road I telephoned Shawna Stone, Clerk to advise that I was withdrawing my nomination for election.

The obvious corollary to this seemingly hurried decision was a call to our estate agent on Hilton Head Island.  I reiterated our desire to secure a tenancy of the same home.  When that was done we made the concerted decision to detour Georgia and drive instead to Hilton Head Island to settle the matter in person.  Since we had left Fort Lauderdale so early in the morning we were on Hilton Head Island by approximately one o’clock in the afternoon.  Denis insisted that we get some lunch before directing ourselves to the estate agent.  We ended by going to Signes, our favourite spot for lemon crumble squares among other things.  Actually I am mistaken about the order of things.  We went to the Marriott resort and spa in Palmetto Dunes first, only to discover that there was virtually no accommodation on the entire Island.  It was only with luck and the gratuitous interference of the Marriott front desk clerk that we secured a place nearby (and to which we shall never return).

All this is by way of preamble.  What has significantly transpired in this short space of time is that I have transformed my project of living from a remake of the standard career model to a veritable retirement scheme.  In an instant I have cut myself loose from commitment and obligation.  In retrospect I see that at the beginning of the New Year (2014) things were happening so fast on the heels of the sale of the office building that I hadn’t allowed myself time to digest my rapidly unfolding affairs.  My anticipated retirement from the practice of law went from a target date of November 30, 2014 to March 31, 2014.  Commensurately the office was precipitously shut down and files transferred to my successor.  On January 1st we hadn’t given any thought whatever to the sale of our house; yet within about fifteen days it was sold and we had effected the ultimate “downsize” including the disposition of tons of surplus stuff we had accumulated for years.  The metaphorical nature of the purge was not lost upon us.  Yet in the heat of the moment I clung to the former need to “do something” which inevitably translated into something I characterized as “productive”.  When therefore several of my colleagues suggested I throw my hat into the election arena I fell for the confidence and mistakenly took up the challenge without a great deal of thought.  In many ways it is an ideal time of my life to undertake public office.  If nothing else it was an opportunity to use my knowledge of the area to good purpose.  But the project collided with what our other plans.  Suddenly I was reminded of those plans and I began the immediate withdrawal from the election campaign.

Now that we have returned to Almonte and now that our destiny is set in stone, my peripheral affairs have correspondingly readjusted.  For example I have given notice of my retirement from the Committee of Adjustment of which I am a member.  My tenure as a Director of the Mississippi River Power Corporation is conveniently about to expire as the Town has already given notice that original Directors such as myself are to be retired after having been on the Board since its creation in 2000.  When I collated all this information I could see that my official duties had nicely dovetailed into imminent obscurity.  In my usual way I view this as serendipitous if indeed not auspicious.  All said it was a good summer holiday.

Success

One might reasonably note the creeping fashion to malign success, the preoccupation with which is viewed as the unintended cause of irreparable harm to the maturation of young people in particular. The corporate push towards success is seen by many as an artificial objective and one without proven advantage. Success isn’t merely the attainment of a goal; it carries with it the typically suggestive hint of higher social status and – in the plainest of terms – the covert threat of failure. While it may be a stretch I am reminded of the learned observation of Lord Alfred T. Denning, Master of the Rolls, viz., a bastard is a child (a judgement considered at the time to run counter to the law). Viewing success as a bad thing still has the same cachet, somehow contrary to popular thinking. In Denning’s time it took the ingenuity of Parliament to reverse the Common Law; and likewise I suspect it will require what is tantamount to statutory authority to reverse years of tradition in our social perspective.

Before entertaining propositions in favour of or against success it is perhaps useful to ask whether it matters in the first place. I am not convinced that it does. Let’s be honest here, success is as amorphous as beauty. Never mind that both concepts could never be battened down; more importantly one has to ask what bonus would be achieved in being a “winner” of such a contest. Surely it is a hollow victory. Even if one seeks to argue that the avoidance of success is equivalent to closing one’s eyes to reality, it requires little examination to conclude that defining anything as successful is not self-explanatory but rather self-fulfilling – namely, success will be what you say or believe it is, just like beauty.

Nonetheless there persists in society a convenient model of success which we customarily apply to our superficial analysis of others. The standards of success are arbitrary milestones of achievement. It may however be a small compliment to a successful person that he or she has attained such markers of conduct and exposition. Of course one can readily pooh-pooh such liberality by noting for example that people like Angela Hewitt are clearly successful by any standard. Herein lies the rub – the difference between the invaluable rock and the polished gem. Are we not however embarking on the wrong inquiry? Quite aside from any standards which might be imposed by the “common man” I wager that Ms. Hewitt would achieve universal approbation with or without our piddling standards. That is, the cream will rise to the top whatever construct we may engage. There remains the question whether being labeled a success has any bearing whatever upon the likes of Ms. Hewitt who (while no doubt happy to have you purchase her albums) is conceivably quite unmoved by the applause and public adoration; I’m guessing that her satisfaction is more personal than otherwise. So, if the denomination of success is a feckless pronouncement one has to ask whom does it benefit? The quandary is especially disturbing when it is recognized that the bestowal of success is nothing more than an after-the-fact recognition of what already exists and which would undoubtedly have existed without the benefit of the gesture.

Stories unfortunately abound of the graduating student voted “Most Likely to Succeed” who ends by practicing death scenes off the local bridge. Being a success can become an abominable imposition. Left to his or her own devices, the successful person will normally advance with the same avidity and motivation in later life as he or she did so previously; and if not, then it will hardly be the fault of lack of recognition. It is useless to add to the list of psychiatric train wrecks another person who felt needlessly pressured to be or become a success.
If one accepts that the majority of people do not fit the customary mold of success then the further debate arises concerning the possible damage to those people who have by default failed. When precisely will the sense of defeat take hold? What are its ramifications? Is success merely a puerile gimmick that we must learn to outgrow? Does anyone really remember or care who got 95% on the history exam in public school? Is he or she truly a success who pursues the model in spite of subsequent inner turmoil and rejection? Is the mad fear of defeat something we want to teach our children? And if not, when do we tell them the gig is up?

Most of us know that the charmed existence of being a student eventually gives way to the comparatively cruel world of adulthood and private commerce. Certainly there persist some organizations and institutions which measure their chosen inductees by the strength of their report card alone. But I can tell you of many other instances where such arbitrary assessment was not only wrong but also needlessly limiting. The number of times which the gauge of success has proven to be inaccurate can only invite a reconsideration of its merit.

The way we look at people, the way we decide upon whom we love or with whom we work, is far too complicated to pretend that it depends in any realistic sense upon their success. Successful people do what they do with or without our endorsement. And I cannot fathom any reason to burden others with what amounts to an alternative cloak of deficiency. Furthermore anyone who imagines for a minute that luck has nothing to do with it is deceiving themselves. You’re neither a success nor a failure – we are human beings and have only to do what contributes to the happiness of ourselves and others.

 

Strawberries and Cream

In a world of surging intricacy it is still the simple things that grab me most. This is I confess a somewhat naive observation. I accept for example that when it comes to technology it isn’t feasible to “keep it simple”. There are nonetheless so many other areas of modern life which lend themselves to far less serpentine calculations. While it may trivialize the manufacturing process to say that I count gold and silver among the simple things in life, it at least illustrates that it is the comprehensible rather than the incomprehensible about which I speak. Some things are just self-evident. On a level closer to home a bowl of fresh strawberries and heavy cream are about as good as it gets! In that respect simplicity is so often associated with what is elemental. The conjunction of primary forces and nature is not to be ignored as primitive as it may at first appear. It may even spark a supernatural manifestation in the form of purity, clarity and of course healthfulness.

By contrast complexity is frequently teamed up with cunning and treachery. Indeed the best smoke screen for chicanery is compound detail. How often has it been said that if someone genuinely knows what they are talking about they can explain it in simple terms? The appeal of simplicity is its readiness to exposition, adoption, incorporation or digestion. To say “It’s complicated” is as often as not merely code for deceit.

Embracing the simple things in life invariably involves the rejection of any other. Almost by definition the simple life exacts a degree of austerity. Granted this may be more aesthetic than economic. The deficiency is perhaps more perceptual than substantive but in every instance there persists a feature of restraint, a starkness reminiscent of sobriety and chastity. The preference for simplicity translates into basics on almost every level echoing that which is rudimentary and essential. Taken to the extreme simplicity can become purely binary though in my opinion exclusive duality does little credit to the depth of the characteristic. Consider for example the intensity of the primary colours, the dynamic and distinctive jewel tones which capture a distinction often expressed in traditional and religious significance.

Simplicity has insinuated itself into some of the most unlikely aspects of life, everything from food to fashion, cars to shelter, furniture to hair design and of course language and art. As a former legal practitioner I regret that the bias has not yet completely overtaken the hackneyed language of law but there is no question that it is happening gradually. Simplicity affords not only intelligibility but is by far less mind-numbing than complexity. Apart from the possible nefarious objective of complexity one has to ask why bother with it when a less soul-destroying avenue is open for pursuit?

Though much of the texture of simplicity is conjoined with the visceral experience one mustn’t discount its equally compelling spiritual and emotional strength. Just as we declutter our material world to afford the simple life so too we set free our minds from the bollards to which we are traditionally tied. There is a risk that setting ourselves free of constraint will in some instances cause offence either because our agenda is too patent and plain or because our social conventions are less contrived and therefore more grating or discernible. The profit however is painless and unaffected communication.

It is a mistake to dismiss the simple life as simplistic. Remember that the process of distillation is all about removing impurities and the resulting nectar is typically of higher quality and potency. It is a process of extracting the essential meaning and important aspects of something, a process of separating component substances based on volatility. The cream will rise to the top.

Renewing Acquaintances

If ever you’ve had an acquaintance in the past which though fervent at the time eventually dwindled into nothing, you may be tempted to renew it. I am not suggesting that you write a sequel to the event, just a step into the past for the sake of interest, catching up as it were. Whether the temptation is serendipitous or by design, it is a high-risk business. Primarily the risk is that what you recall is greatly removed from what now exists. Cold water doesn’t begin the describe the sensation. Alarm and disillusionment may be the unwelcome and unanticipated results. Even if the the ramifications are not ill-fated there is also the gamble that you’ll entirely forfeit all those cherished memories some of which may even have strengthened with the effluxion of time. Nonetheless if the initial zeal were genuine it is hardly dishonest to reawaken the once heartfelt enthusiasm. Besides every good love story contains an element of intrigue.

Turning back the clock – offensive as it is to both logic and nature – is for most people generally unexplored territory. Special forensic talents are required and mastery of the effects of time demands exceptional philosophical resource (essentially the avid use of charitable rationalization). It would of course be injudicious at best to imagine that the evolution of the atomic world has not wrought its metamorphosis upon all that once was. Knowing this one must be alert to the original motivations of the acquaintance. It is exoteric that youthful romantic ardour is an unreliable thermometer of commitment clouded as it no doubt was by erstwhile elemental urges. If however you can get over that provocative hump there may well have been a more profound nexus between you two and perhaps that constitutional strain can be rediscovered in the relationship.

As odd as it may sound, when it comes to people to whom we were once attracted, we often fail to take into account that in spite of the lapse of decades they may have actually had other relationships and involvements. Strangely they did not remain inert upon the dissolution of the former connection. Becoming alive to this redundancy can astonishingly spark a degree of jealousy or may at least be off-putting in spite of its illegitimacy. Such a reaction makes as much sense as suffering disappointment when attempting to fit into a dusty tuxedo that fit you twenty years ago – not going to happen! – as marvellous as it may have once appeared. What is more likely than not is that the other person has moved on to a more complicated relationship and one which is bound by years of experience and interdependence. Throwing yourself unprepared into that web may have some sticky consequences!

There is also the fundamental threat that the co-conspirator no longer harbours the same cheerful view of the former liaison. As improbable as we may imagine it to be, people are not always as captivated by us as we might prefer to believe. For this reason alone one should be cautious when reigniting the flame to portray the semblance of mere dalliance lest the perceived motivation precipitates immediate and unrequited rebuttal. Such a casual approach to the affair enables you to extricate yourself with limited exposure not to mention the avoidance of total embarrassment.

Even if you manage to make it through all those obstacles the proof of your determination lies in the reception of that hackneyed line, “You must come and visit” failing which you have hit a dead end. All the prior assurances about how wonderful it was to hear from you are for naught if those follow-up words are missing. Indeed their omission is the height of social rejection. It is an austere conclusion to a hapless adventure.

In the end you may consider it best to ignore the urge to relive the past in any respect. Why tarnish the glow? Why risk translating the experience from memorable to forgettable? Why magnify to the point of harshness the disparities that initially caused the separation? Why suffer the sanctity of your memories to follow the same course of erosion as the rest of you (remember, you’ve changed too)? Renewing acquaintances is a treacherous path and perhaps even unnatural. To fly in the face of the ordinary course of things is not only uncommon but also laboured. It may be best to wall your eyes and sigh, a private reminiscence of no consequence.

 

Election Frenzy

Whatever people may think about politicians and the political process, there is little that gets them talking more volubly than an election. Many constituents take an avid interest in what is about to transpire in the public affairs of our Province. Awakening one morning to the overnight proliferation of election signs at every public corner is the first taste of the bloodsport that is politics. We may be sadly reminded of the nastiness of the business when we witness the first of successive sign mutilations, spawning a debate whether the attack is that of youthful vandals without an agenda or whether there is indeed something shifty about the foot soldiers of competing delegations. Whatever the conclusion the activity lays bare the raw side of humanity, a trumpet to the battle that is to ensue.

With equal gravity and polarization the division of parties, candidates and interests follows. The normal wishy-washy discussion of one’s health and the weather is instantly replaced by adamant and uncompromising statements as plain as the teeth of an angry dog when encroaching upon its bowl of food. There is plenty of jealous nourishment here for the voter no matter how involved he or she was only days before in the machinations of the Province’s elected officials. Some electors are even prompted to display their brazen armour, sword and spear by a proclamation of intractable bias in the form of a lawn sign. Gossip is rife with innuendo about party politics, corporate bagmen and general self-interest. Social niceities quickly give way to elemental and sometimes base causes of every description. Marginal differences on issues become epic idealogical disagreements.

Frequently the political stew is spiced by the candidacy of a new face, often a younger one. This natural concession to the evolution of society nonetheless raises the spectre of stock prejudices which in their most charitable form are characterized as the conflict between energy and experience. The over-riding party mantra ensures the disparity is seldom about initiative and tradition but the creeping favour for dark hair and a clear compexion is compelling. Only occasionally is there the novelty and humour of the likes of the Rhinoceros Party; politics is largely a serious business and the erstwhile mockery of our elected representatives gives way instead to grim-faced pronouncements.

It is the privilege of the masses, much like the former Roman citizens at the Flavian Amphitheatre, to watch with greedy and sometimes barbarous delight the unfolding campaign tactics of the unctuous candidates. The spectacle is at times circus-like with particularly enthusiastic contenders taking to the street to wave like a puppet at on-coming traffic or to pretend to be your long-lost friend in front of the local hardware or grocery store on a Saturday morning. Others confine their election operations to the somewhat less contentious custom of door-to-door confrontations, a model which historically has received mixed reviews but which for some voters is the deciding factor one way or the other. In our riding we have the singular advantage of being able to attend an “All Candidates” evening which – even if you’re not dedicated to hearing the details of each political plank – is rather like the annual country fair, an opportunity for mild amusement and communion with one’s neighbours. The opportunity also affords the rank and file the chance to demonstrate its interest and determination in the political process, one to be crowned eventually with the hard-won right to cast a vote.

Until voting day however there are likely to be far more intrusions upon our private life about the pundits’ predictable results than we would prefer. The media is thrown the proverbial bone upon which to gnaw to its heart’s content. Some members of the pubic have satisfactorily aligned themselves with the process to guarantee modest employment at polling stations. When election day is at last upon us there are few who can resist the temptation to learn the results. It is the public lottery in which we all have a stake and a ticket.

Do Municipal Politics Matter?

There are any number of things which transpire in life about which we have little or no concern. It is however equally true that if we were to suffer the deprivation of those same things we might find ourselves up in arms. The fact of the matter is that we take a great deal for granted and just assume that there is a hidden management which is taking care of what are important but otherwise uninspiring details of daily living. I am here talking of municipal politics. With the exception of very few constituents, and except when there is a particularly hot topic which occasionally engages the momentary interest of the populace, most people haven’t the time for what is seamlessly happening in their own backyard and under their noses.

It is only fair to excuse the disinterest of the so-called “average citizen” by acknowledging that there is already sufficient to occupy him or her. There are not many who have nothing better to do than to stew over such dry matters as the annual cost of dealing with pot holes ($3,496,755.00), garbage collection ($1,555,713.00), libraries ($479,617.00), fire trucks ($669,624.00), council administration ($948,890.00), policing ($1,683,204.00) or even the county and schools ($9,991,340.00). It may indeed surprise you to know that the Chief Administrative Officer of the Town of Mississippi Mills and the elected Council are handling an annual budget of about $22,000,000.

It is normally only at the time of an election that interest is sparked in local government and even then the involvement of the electors is often confined to an “All Candidates” evening or perhaps a brief chat with a prospective councillor on the street or at one’s front door (admittedly a rare event). The elector is badgered into moderate activity by the embarrassment of civic duty and electoral privilege. But this is a passing admonition and one which is easily expiated by casting a vote on election day or at one of the advanced polls. Once that duty is accomplished the constituent can safely ease back into private matters for another four years.

As neglectful as most of us are of the mundane processes of municipal affairs it is oddly true that if asked almost everyone has a strong opinion about what should or should not be done. The involvement is traditionally selective and as a result is frequently out of context, rather like assessing a buffet on the strength of one dish. Nonetheless politics is very much like any other primal appetite in that its appeal if any derives from immediate need or instinctive interest – such as road maintenance or realty taxes. Technical commotions relating to proposed zoning changes or minor variances of by-laws are virtually negligible unless promoted by your next door neighbour.

I would be hard pressed to deny that municipal politics is generally considered the least absorbing of the three levels of government. To lapse into dismay about this state of affairs is hardly worth the effort. Imagining that there is a realistic chance of heightening a sustained interest in local government is akin to retailing the Christmas spirit all year long. The attraction is bound to be short-lived. Nonetheless I believe that in politics as in all other spheres there is advantage to be derived from knowledge. It is a mistake to assume that the questionable curiosity of the masses will be sustained by politicians merely doing their job. Government, being as it is so closely aligned with the legislative process, must, like the administration of law itself, not only be done but must be seen to be done. Accountability like sunlight is not only a disinfectant but also an inspiration. Constituents will I believe respond favourably to disclosure about community administration.

Once the interest of people is tweaked it remains to stimulate their involvement by encouraging communication. Opinions fuelled by knowledge can reveal some delightful ramifications. No longer is it sufficient to presume that the pubic is unamused by the business of the municipality. More than ever the importance of the democratic process and the supremacy of the majority have strengthened the need for and desirability of public participation. If nothing else in a community such as ours the incredible intellectual resources of our citizens is not to be diminished or disregarded.