It’s a simple enough question, “Why do you get up in the morning?” Yet it is not simple to answer. The knottiness of the answer is naturally not any restraint or irresolvable impediment to do so. We all do it. Eventually. Rather it is the peculiarity and variety of answers, many of which are seemingly blunt and uninteresting or too vulgar and bawdy to bare repeating. It is nonetheless upon examination a complicated issue, one which merits at once both intellectual, poetic, philosophic and natural reply. Some reasons however tend more to the psychological vein and they can paint a very sharp or austere image of a reluctance to remove oneself from beneath the covers. One recalls for example the likes of Søren Kierkegaard, Simone de Beauvoir, Jean-Paul Sartre, Friedrich Nietzsche, Albert Camus and the theatre of the absurd.
According to Albert Camus, the world or the human being is not in itself absurd. The concept only emerges through the juxtaposition of the two; life becomes absurd due to the incompatibility between human beings and the world they inhabit. This view constitutes one of the two interpretations of the absurd in existentialist literature. The second view, first elaborated by Søren Kierkegaard, holds that absurdity is limited to actions and choices of human beings. These are considered absurd since they issue from human freedom, undermining their foundation outside of themselves.
The absurd contrasts with the claim that “bad things don’t happen to good people”; to the world, metaphorically speaking, there is no such thing as a good person or a bad person; what happens happens, and it may just as well happen to a “good” person as to a “bad” person. Because of the world’s absurdity, anything can happen to anyone at any time and a tragic event could plummet someone into direct confrontation with the absurd.
Continue reading →